First aid and CPR training
A short course carrying the hardest evidence on this whole list: across 30,381 witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Sweden, 30-day survival was 10.5% with bystander CPR against 4.0% without it.
- Level
- Personal
- Cost
- Low cost
- Effort
- Days
- Evidence
- Observed
What it does not solve
It resolves nothing systemic. It changes the outcome for one person beside you in the minutes before an ambulance arrives, and that is its entire scope.
It works if there is someone unconscious next to you and an ambulance on the way. It is the measure with the hardest evidence on this whole list and it has nothing to do with AI: in 30,381 witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Sweden between 1990 and 2011, 10.5% were still alive at 30 days when somebody performed CPR before the emergency services arrived, against 4.0% when nobody did. Adjusted by propensity score, the odds ratio is 2.15, with a 95% confidence intervalConfidence intervalThe range within which the true value probably lies, given what was measured. The wider it is, the less precise the measurement. It is abbreviated CI.For exampleLike saying you will arrive “between 7 and 7:20”: you do not know the exact minute, but you do know the margin. between 1.88 and 2.45 [498]Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrestView source ↗verified through Crossref.
It does not work if the problem is systemic. No scenario on this site stops because more people know CPR.
Evidence. Large, longitudinal, with an effect sustained over two decades and with a hard outcome. It comes from another field, and that is why it is solid.
Cost. A short course, once, with a refresher every so often.
What it does NOT solve. Nothing structural. Its best argument is also the most modest one: it pays off next Tuesday, without any catastrophe happening, and that is a bar almost no other measure on this list clears. If you are going to do one single thing from here and you do not depend on a medical device, this is probably it.
Works if…
- Catastrophe through misuse · Partial
It helps in the local emergency phase of any event with injuries or failed medical equipment. It does not touch the cause.
- AI as normal technology · Partial
Its best argument is not catastrophe: it pays off next Tuesday, with nothing extraordinary happening.
Does not work if…
- Gradual disempowerment · Does not work
- Rapid loss of control · Does not work
Risks it addresses
See in the protection matrix →Report a mistake in this entry →
Sources
- [498] Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest · Hasselqvist-Ax, Ingela 2015 verified through Crossref