Skip to content
OGERIA — Observatory of Global Evidence on Risks in AISynthesis report · 2026 ed.
Updated 2 Oct 2026

Chapter 06 · Protection

First aid and CPR training

A short course carrying the hardest evidence on this whole list: across 30,381 witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Sweden, 30-day survival was 10.5% with bystander CPR against 4.0% without it.

Level
Personal
Cost
Low cost
Effort
Days
Evidence
Observed

What it does not solve

It resolves nothing systemic. It changes the outcome for one person beside you in the minutes before an ambulance arrives, and that is its entire scope.

It works if there is someone unconscious next to you and an ambulance on the way. It is the measure with the hardest evidence on this whole list and it has nothing to do with AI: in 30,381 witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Sweden between 1990 and 2011, 10.5% were still alive at 30 days when somebody performed CPR before the emergency services arrived, against 4.0% when nobody did. Adjusted by propensity score, the odds ratio is 2.15, with a 95% confidence intervalConfidence intervalThe range within which the true value probably lies, given what was measured. The wider it is, the less precise the measurement. It is abbreviated CI.For exampleLike saying you will arrive “between 7 and 7:20”: you do not know the exact minute, but you do know the margin. between 1.88 and 2.45 [498]Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrestHasselqvist-Ax, Ingela; Riva, Gabriel; Herlitz, Johan et al. · 2015 · paperView source ↗verified through CrossrefAccessed on 9 September 2026.

It does not work if the problem is systemic. No scenario on this site stops because more people know CPR.

Evidence. Large, longitudinal, with an effect sustained over two decades and with a hard outcome. It comes from another field, and that is why it is solid.

Cost. A short course, once, with a refresher every so often.

What it does NOT solve. Nothing structural. Its best argument is also the most modest one: it pays off next Tuesday, without any catastrophe happening, and that is a bar almost no other measure on this list clears. If you are going to do one single thing from here and you do not depend on a medical device, this is probably it.

Works if…

  • Catastrophe through misuse · Partial

    It helps in the local emergency phase of any event with injuries or failed medical equipment. It does not touch the cause.

  • AI as normal technology · Partial

    Its best argument is not catastrophe: it pays off next Tuesday, with nothing extraordinary happening.

Does not work if…

  • Gradual disempowerment · Does not work
  • Rapid loss of control · Does not work

See in the protection matrix →Report a mistake in this entry →

Sources

  1. [498] Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest · Hasselqvist-Ax, Ingela 2015 verified through Crossref

Ask OGERIA

It answers only with what the observatory publishes and can be wrong: check the entries it cites. Your questions are sent to an AI model, so don't write personal data. More in the privacy policy.

Up to 500 characters.

Support OGERIA on Ko-fi

The payment is processed by Ko-fi, not by this site. Open on ko-fi.com